Who's in It?
Jeremy Renner, Rachel Weisz and Edward Norton
What's it About?
Crossing paths with the most recent Bourne incarnation and the result of the previous three, The Bourne Legacy is our introduction to Aaron Cross and his relentless fight to stay enhanced but, more importantly, to stay alive.
Brothers Dan and Tony Gilmore take the helm, writing and directing respectively to bring us the fourth instalment of the Bourne franchise. But it doesn't pick up where The Bourne Ultimatum leaves off, more dovetails the events of the previous film, meaning that despite Jason Bourne never physically making an appearance, his shadow is all over this story.
Instead of doing a Bond type switcheroo with the protagonist when Matt Damon refused to return, we're instead invited to believe that 'There was never just one'. While no one will ever live up to Damon's role in the trilogy for me, if broadening the super spy employee roster means we get Jeremy Renner then I'm all for it.
|They're not crossbows!|
Our movie starts in several locations, flitting back and forth between a hirsute Cross (Renner) in the wilds of Alaska Bear Grylls style being hunted by a pack of wolves and medicating himself daily and to the panicked meeting rooms of CIA intelligence pitching a fit about Bourne running amok. While the Bourne trilogy are some of my favourite films, the first third of this movie relies heavily on the assumption that we're über fans, have memorised the previous plots and can pick up the story line immediately. Most of us haven't and don't.
It's a little hard to follow at first for that very reason but it's safe to say that the Government want their elite, neurally controlled soldiers out of commission i.e. dead before they can reveal any information about the top secret operation they've been running. Sounds familiar, right? This time though we see that there's always been a bajillion (exact figure) similar operations, conveniently opening the door to many, many more movies.
|The powers that be led by Colnol Byler (Norton)|
Once it picks up the adrenaline pumping action is truly Bourne worthy, it takes a very long while to do that though, focussing more and the detailed plot and layered story lines. The basic premise is essentially the same, the Government are trying to kill the good guy, but this is where Renner brings something different to the table. We're never shown that he's the good guy, we know very little about him, other than he will stop at nothing to get the 'chems' he needs. He's edgier than Bourne, appears colder and makes calculated decisions and kills with little or no remorse.
While both Renner and Weisz are hugely entertaining in the lead roles, there's never really a connection or relationship development with their characters (I'm guessing they hadn't the time when everyone's trying to shoot, stab and maim 'em) but still, just as the adrenalin starts really pumping, we're given a Bond like ending, far too abruptly.
It's clear that this is just the beginning of a revival of the Bourne series, while it's predecessors were slick, clever and relentless, this outing was more of a slow burn that only picked up pace toward the end. More a Bourne 3 and half but with untold promise. I would have preferred they either waited for a better story or started the action earlier, but nevertheless, it's an enjoyable outing with some of the most amazing chase and action sequences you'll see this year thrown in.
Do yourself a favour and re-watch The Bourne Ultimatum before you head along to 'Legacy', the high should be enough to allow you to hit the ground running.